Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Deck Wins | luffydochapeudepalha | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765769 |
| Gruul Aggro | mogged | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765784 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | -nausea- | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769865 |
| Red Deck Wins | numberonenoob | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769907 |
| Red Deck Wins | kablewire | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769892 |
| Red Deck Wins | latorretta | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769073 |
| Gruul Aggro | mogged | 7-1 | None |
| Goblins | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Red Deck Wins | pedrastone | 7-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769073 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Big Red , Boros Aggro , Boros Auras , Boros Burn , Boros Convoke , Boros Mice , Goblins , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Cauldron , Gruul Counters
Meta Performance Analysis
Witchstalker Frenzy ranks #328 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 79%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 63.8%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Witchstalker Frenzy is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 16.15 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.6%. Witchstalker Frenzy has a win rate of 75.6%, making it 1.3% better than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leyline of the Void | Enchantment | 8 | 78.7% | 3 |
| Demonic Ruckus | Enchantment — Aura | 12 | 69.6% | 4 |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 55 | 69.3% | 15 |
| Invasion of Tarkir | Battle — Siege | 5 | 65.9% | 0 |
| Royal Treatment | Instant | 6 | 65.7% | 1 |
| Duress | Sorcery | 15 | 63.0% | 4 |
| Go for the Throat | Instant | 13 | 62.1% | 4 |
| Magebane Lizard | Creature — Lizard | 24 | 60.4% | 4 |
| Callous Sell-Sword | Creature — Human Soldier // Sorcery — Adventure | 18 | 56.2% | 6 |
| Lightning Strike | Instant | 1259 | 54.5% | 280 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Witchstalker Frenzy than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chandra, Spark Hunter | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 4 | 7 | 89.1% | 76.0% | +13.1% |
| Shock | Instant | 1 | 5 | 92.9% | 80.1% | +12.8% |
| Ephara's Dispersal | Instant | 3 | 5 | 87.0% | 76.1% | +10.8% |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 12 | 83.8% | 75.8% | +8.0% |
| Into the Flood Maw | Instant | 1 | 34 | 85.1% | 77.2% | +7.9% |
| Soul-Guide Lantern | Artifact | 1 | 5 | 81.0% | 74.3% | +6.6% |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 59 | 82.8% | 76.6% | +6.3% |
| Third Path Iconoclast | Creature — Human Monk | 2 | 30 | 84.7% | 79.9% | +4.8% |
| Stormchaser's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 1 | 60 | 81.2% | 76.5% | +4.7% |
| Bounce Off | Instant | 1 | 19 | 85.6% | 81.1% | +4.4% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Deck Wins | 1231 | 88.5% | 54.4% |
| Gruul Aggro | 1041 | 50.0% | 51.9% |
| Izzet Spellslingers | 83 | 56.1% | 73.9% |
| Boros Burn | 79 | 19.9% | 50.4% |
| Gruul Delirium | 43 | 27.9% | 29.9% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.